OK why not, it's a classic setup, and you have teams dedicated to search & destroy any old item, even the most innocent ones like the PEZ dispenserīut then, why is NOBODY adressing the elephant in the room ? Apparently knowledge about old tech or old culture is forbidden. people make a great deal about owning or even knowing about certain items "from before". Ok, if you don't want more don't click on the rest. First thing first, i'm just talking about one thing : The window in the restaurant & in the cell in the sheriff office So here goes nothing, click at your own risk. Obviously I didn't read the books & i don't want to be spoiled by bookworms -) FYI I'm at episode 6 right now (so yes but no, not my point). But I have a MAJOR issue with something since episode 1, and I don't know how to talk about it without spoiler. You can enjoy staring at leaves because clearly your judgement is not one anyone should take seriously □ It's easy to be a critique but to take it's something differently. The acting is solid and equivalent to many other fantastic shows I've seen we shall say west world and severance. It's not clear and that's what creates the sense of curiosity. Yes there are areas such as clothing that we are unaware of but your imagination assumes in the same way they grow crops that they have the materials to do the same to make clothes so it's a silly point really? It's not always about what you see the whole premis of the show is that there's underlying seeds. But we are also expected to follow with the narrative. In adaptions like this we never get the detail and dialogue we are looking for from literature. The script is t awful at all, good but if your fussy you could potentially go for mediocre. It sounds like you had preconceived ideas of what to expect or an idea of what you should be getting. at least I tried.Īh dude I think your coming from it totally the wrong way. If this post saves just one person from watching it, then it's worth it. Not the most in-depth review, I know, but the more I thought about "Silo," the less I wanted to. I'd give it a rating, but I think "I'd rather stare at a leaf" sums up my feelings perfectly.Īnyway, that's it. I guess even solid actors can't do much with a script like this one. Where's the fabric coming from? Are they using fresh water to clean them? Who knows? It's a detail, sure, but it's these things that make or break a story's vibe, you know? Perfect example: the character's spiffy suits. Next, the logic of this show is, well, illogical. Kinda hard to get invested when it's her newly-met acquaintance that did the lying. Case in point: the sheriff's "he lied and now who am I?" bit. But maybe my two cents can help someone save a bit of time, so here goes.įirst off, the dialogue? It's all over the place. I wasn't planning on doing a deep dive on any episodes of "Silo." Frankly, the show doesn't warrant that kind of effort.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |